The idea of a women only gym seems innocent enough. After all, many women may feel more comfortable exercising in a gym where there are no men around. In a women only gym, they would be more likely to give and receive open advice on their health condition and their workout plan. With women-centric trainers, females could likely get better advice as well as have options for activities that may not be available in co-ed gyms. There are also religious factors to consider. Some women are simply prohibited to expose too much of their bodies to men.

But are women only gyms guilty of discrimination?

A women only gym means that no men are allowed. Period. No questions asked, right? There have been cases where men have tried to joining a women only gym and sued when they were denied access. There might be some question as to why a man would want to join a women only gym; whether his intentions are to simply be disruptive or because of some ulterior motive. However, there may very well be a good reason for a man to want to join a women only gym. It could be that there are no other facilities in his local area or region. It could be that the particular women only club meets with the man’s health requirements.

Despite the growing popularity of women only clubs, there are a handful of lawsuits that claim these clubs are discriminatory. In 2000, the Alaskan Human Rights Commission–at the behest of a disgruntled man–made an attempt to ban gender only health clubs. However, the result of that backfired when the Alaskan legislature made it legal for gender discrimination in Alaskan health clubs.

More recently, there was a case in 2005 where a civil rights group sued a women only club in Santa Rosa for potentially refusing entry of one man. It turned out that the women only gym had already been told to make changes to accommodate men in 2004, but had failed to do so. This refusal led to the 2005 case being brought up and consequently enforced.

What followed were successful lawsuits against women only gyms in Minnesota, Wisconsin, California and Orange County. Some of these cases were won on the premise that men were not only denied access to work out at the clubs but also because they were also denied employment. In a case against Women’s Workout World in Chicago, not only were men finally allowed to work at the gym, but the ones who were turned down were paid $30,000 in damages. In 1997, a lawsuit against a Massachusetts health club, Healthworks Fitness Center, ruled that the club could not exclude men.

And despite the small number of men opposed to women only health clubs, you would be surprised to find that they have actually gotten some support from NOW (National Organization for Women) who object to any law they feel is permitting discrimination.

Due to the amount of protests from angry women regarding rulings in favor of men, many states have passed legislation to permit single-sex health clubs that benefit both sexes. These states are Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Tennessee and New Jersey. NOW has objected to each of these rulings.

In another twist of events, in 2008 North Carolina sued Peak fitness for actually going from a women only gym to a co-ed gym! In this case, Peak fitness closed its women only Arboretum gym and notified members that they could use other Peak fitness facilities. Peak fitness would not release the contracts of those women who didn’t want to be forced to go to a co-ed gym. The state of North Carolina argued that Peak should have released those women from their contracts. The final ruling was that Peak fitness could not continue to take money from former Arboretum members without permission.

There are many opinions on the issue of women only gyms. The general feeling from most people is that it is fine to have women only gyms as long as there can be men only gyms as well. After all, it is true that men act differently when around only men, and so it only seems right to have a place where a man can work out comfortably without women present.

But for many women’s rights advocates, women only gyms and men only gyms open up the door for further discrimination against women in other areas.  Many activist groups claim this could actually be a step back for women’s rights!

What do you think?  Leave a comment below..

    354 replies to "Are Women-Only Gyms Guilty of Discrimination?"

    • Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and
      wished to say that I’ve really enjoyed surfing around your blog
      posts. In any case I will be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!

    • Have you ever thought about publishing an ebook or guest authoring on other
      websites? I have a blog based on the same ideas you discuss and would love to have you share
      some stories/information. I know my readers would
      value your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel
      free to shoot me an e mail.

    • Do you mind if I quote a few of your posts as long as I provide credit
      and sources back to your webpage? My blog is in the
      exact same area of interest as yours and my users would definitely benefit
      from some of the information you present here.
      Please let me know if this alright with you. Thank you!

    • I always spent my half an hour to read this webpage’s posts every day along with a cup
      of coffee.

    • Keep this going please, great job! plenty of fish

    • Good day! Do you use Twitter? I’d like to follow you if
      that would be ok. I’m definitely enjoying your blog and look forward to new posts.

    • Greetings! I’ve been following your web site for a long time now and finally got the courage to go ahead and
      give you a shout out from Huffman Tx! Just wanted to
      tell you keep up the excellent job!

    • This particular certainly feels like a clear scenario of the RIAA becoming crazy that will not anyone is definitely acquiring audio a lot anymore, and they’re falling in value, and so why don’t just chase zygor gentleman and create THE DOG buy the fact that a lot of other individuals may also be installing. First of all, so why is they need a whole lot of income from him intended for grabbing several tunes??? My lord, some sort of pill seller didn’t acquire punished this poorly. That quantity of your hard-earned money is perfectly preposterous. Secondly, should the particular RIAA be seeking the opposite untold millions of people that obtain and also prosecute them to get huge amount of money also? This kind of entire situation is actually silly. Anyhow, Paul… maintain combating!!
      [url=]coque iphone xs max[/url]

    • This does not have few characteristic and thus iPhone did.. nevertheless its hotselling gadget.. I can not delay to obtain the practical ipad device… . -= Hard Agrawal’s previous blog site… two Free apple ipad tablet Programs for Bloggers =-.
      [url=]coque iphone xs max[/url]

    • The apple company wants starting it has the goods with out certain features purposely. In order to start being active . of these functions inside following discharge and people can obtain the brand new type. . -= Nabeel’s final blog… The way to administrative sign in within home hosted wp blog site =-.
      [url=]coque iphone 8 apple silicone[/url]

    • There are often drawbacks comparing an item with a splash different target., From the above items My spouse and i think you have in comparison the ipad tablet which has a Atom power Notebook Effectively I did not recognize issues that are not necessarily in Apple’s apple ipad tablet. Even though an apple ipad has its restriction, within the good qualities. You can maintain and possesses great efficiency. I can say that ipad device may also a great reach like iphone 3gs.
      [url=]coque iphone 8 apple silicone[/url]

    • The main reason I like Spotify, is I could use it on my Cellular, and also basicly have all the background music My spouse and i wan`t all the time. I complete pay out about $15 thirty days though, however hi! typically the fantasticheria associated with free music is good for kids actually I adore Jango. Way a lot better than Pandora bracelets, for me.
      [url=]coque iphone 8 apple silicone[/url]

    • My spouse and i powerfully go along with the foundation on your disputes together with the RIAA. $1M for several music is definitely preposterous. How could they have got received apart using this looting regarding so long? I truly desire and pray which you all are prosperous in this instance and that the court procedures are generally live so your RIAA may be uncovered for that Shylocks which they and the lawyers/advisers are generally.
      [url=]coque iphone xr[/url]

    • Very good employment about this publish! I especially like how you would introduced your details and also the way you actually made it important and apparent to understand. Thank you a great deal.
      [url=]coque iphone[/url]

    • Wow, this article is pleasant, my sister
      is analyzing such things, so I am going to inform her. pof natalielise

    • Thanks for sharing your thoughts on Passenger car.


Comments are closed.